Customer Experience Partners

Blog | Introduction | About Us | Services | Philosophy | Articles and publications | Contact Us

This site  The Web 

The world of Customer Experience Managment and the

challenges we face are changing each day.
 Please post your views and comments, or contact us directly at

 pruden@customerexperiencepartners.com to let us know what you think.

Friday, February 5, 2010

Tropicana Juicy Rewards – Really delivering VALUE?
Tropicana just rolled out a new marketing effort called Juicy Rewards.  Company representatives characterize it as the largest marketing investment for its orange juice brand.  It’s a points based program that promises to reward purchase behavior.  The program strategy is reportedly driven by a survey in which “98 percent of participants said they wanted more value from the products and services that they buy”.   Tropicana further states that the program is “about engaging with them (customers) and building a relationship”. 

I could only shudder as I read the announcement.  There are a lot of smart people over at Pepsi and I can’t believe that someone hasn’t pointed out to the managers at Tropicana that customers are always in search of more value (in fact you have to wonder if the 2% who didn’t report that they wanted more value actually read the question before responding).  After all, as consumers we are always seeking “value” in one form or another.  If we aren’t getting some form of rational or emotional value in return, why in the world would we be willing to part with our hard earned dollars?

Perhaps the real question comes down to understanding value.  We encourage clients to think of value in the form of an equation.  The numerator including the entire product and service experience delivered by the brand, and the denominator being everything you give up to acquire the product or service.  In order to provide more value and thereby increase purchase behavior the company can either add to the numerator or reduce the denominator.  Sounds simple.  It’s not.

The “experience” in Tropicana’s case includes the look of the orange juice, the smell of the orange juice, the taste, the look of the packaging, the feel of the packaging, the memories that are stirred by the packaging, the feelings created through advertising, the freshness of the product, the availability of the product, experiences with Tropicana customer service at headquarters, and more.  The denominator surely does include price, but  for a product like Tropicana orange juice it could also include any special effort required of the customer in finding a convenient location to buy the brand, any negative reactions they would encounter from their family upon changing brands, and any risk that might feel personally in switching brands.

When you consider all that you might wonder what, as the market leader, Tropicana is hoping to gain from a points program. How valuable are those points really going to be?  Exactly what behavior is this program attempting to drive?  Considering that the company admits that it doesn’t expect current customers to buy any more orange juice as a result of the program, why are they making the investment (remember they’ve characterized it as the largest marketing investment ever for the brand)?  Do they expect that the customers of their competitors will make a switch to Tropicana (perhaps even pay a higher price) to be part of Juicy Rewards?  (Based on what has been announced to date it sounds like rewards will come in the form of discount coupons to be used for active lifestyle goods and services.)

One final thought.  I always challenge the creators of points programs like this to prove that they have delivered a reasonable ROI.  In most cases we hear about how much product participants in the program buy.  But weren’t those largely loyal customers purchasing even before the points program?  Did the points program really provide incremental sales?  New customers?  How do those incremental sales compare to the dollars (and time) spent to fund the points program? 

I seldom get answers to those questions. 

It’s difficult for me to envision a scenario in which Juicy Rewards will truly build “relationships” with customers.   It’s even more difficult to believe that it will produce an acceptable ROI.

9:49 am est          Comments

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

They Should Have Known - Even Without Twitter
It’s great that GM has recognized the power of social media and invited David Meerman Scott to Detroit for an inside look a few months ago. We all appreciate that American Airlines is learning and posting information about delays on the website and distributing information via Twitter. Hopefully what corporations are hearing will lead to not only a better image, but also better service. 

But negative word of mouth should have been a concern long before we had Tweets, blogs, and YouTube videos.  We’ve known for years that an unhappy customer tell 8-11 other people or more about their experience while happy customer tells only 3-4 (if they bother to tell anyone).  All the electronic media that is now part of all our lives has simply amplified the voices of those unhappy customers while all the attention paid to social media has given them greater visibility.   Even as corporations tune in and respond to what is being written online, for every prominent blogger reaching a thousand followers, there are likely 100 regular customers reaching out through text messages, emails, phone calls, and even face-to-face conversations to share their experiences with 8-10 friends, co-workers, relatives, and neighbors.  When you do the math, the impact is the same.   

Attention is needed is needed both online and offline if corporations are going to succeed in shifting the balance between the negative communications that poisons the well for new customers, and the positive word of mouth that builds awareness, consideration, trial, purchase and retention.
10:22 am est          Comments

Thursday, January 7, 2010

High Service Levels – Always the Best Answer?
In its recently released "2009 Customer Experience Consumer Study", Strativity reports that “unhappy customers are 10 times more likely to cease doing business with companies within the next 12 months than loyal ones” and that “happy customers are three times as likely to continue doing business with a company for 10 years.”  While I personally question any piece of marketing research that asks consumers to envision what they will be doing in 10 years, the basic tone of their findings is not surprising.  But what makes a customer “happy”? Based upon their survey data Strativity explains that: "Customers are seeking value -- it can come either from a great experience at a fair price or a discount if they're not getting that experience”.   Again we have no disagreement with that position. Where we do differ is with their conclusion.  We agree that companies must choose how they want to play the Value Equation, but according to Strativity, "Smart companies are getting it -- they realize that the experience must be exceptional."  That sounds great, but it contradicts the earlier discussion of VALUE. The fact is that different things are more or less IMPORTANT to different individuals.  It assumes that there aren’t consumers who are in fact most “happy” when they buy at a low price (even when that means low service).  Further their conclusion ignores the fact that we all simply can’t afford to have the very best total customer experience with each and every product and service we buy.

We are talking about business strategy here, and in virtually every category there is likely a place for some brand to succeed at high price/high service, while another is equally profitable as a low price/low service option (with most others in between the extremes).  The issues for corporate managers is in understanding the competition and finding the appropriate VALUE position space in which they can run a profitable business for the long term or for the short term.

Our work at Customer Experience Partners is about helping clients manage the customer experience to achieve greater retention and more positive word of mouth. It isn’t well matched for those taking the low price/low service position, however that does not at all mean that low price/low service is not a valid business strategy for some brands.
10:10 am est          Comments

Monday, November 30, 2009

Look Beyond The Headline - Or Take Your Chances

Having conducted a study earlier this year for a prominent orthodontist, in which we found close to 75% of parents communicating their feelings and opinions about the doctor and the category, but doing it off line, I was initially surprised by the findings from MomConnection, The Parenting Group's research panel of 5,000 moms.  According to their research, “60% of moms report having used a social network in the past 24 hours, and turning to online communities and social networks for advice, support and connection.”  We are told that over 80% are members of Facebook and other social networks.

 

Facebook Is Moms' Social Network Of Choice

Social Network

% of Moms Who Are Members

Facebook

81%

Classmates.com

39%

Myspace

38%

YouTube

36%

CafeMom

31%

Twitter

23%

LinkedIn

21%

 Source: MomConnection, November 2009

  

That’s the part of the research that made the headlines 

For those who took the time to read a bit deeper into the report we learn however that moms do not use social networks as a resource when it comes to product decision-making.  Moms are four times more likely to turn to their personal offline network of friends and family than online social networks for product recommendations and buying advice.  

The study found that the role of social networks in moms' lives is not a channel where most moms are receptive to gathering product information, but rather is largely for entertainment and personal communication. Only 24% of respondents have used Facebook for product information and buying advice, while 5% have used Myspace for product info, and 3% have used Twitter  
In other words telephone calls and face-to-face communications aren’t the only way to deliver information and recommendations any longer, but they still do matter most when making those important decisions about home and family.

8:37 pm est          Comments

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Should You Wine and Dine Your Badvocates?
Forbes.com recently ran a story about some of corporate America's big players and their attempts to address the negative word of mouth being launched online by "BADVOCATES".  It's great that GM is recognizing the power of social media and inviting David Meerman Scott to Detroit for an inside look. We all welcome that American Airlines is learning and posting information about delays on the website and distributing information via Twitter. Hopefully what corporations are hearing online will lead to not only a better image, but also better service.

But negative word of mouth should have been a concern long before we had Tweets, blogs, and YouTube videos. We've known for years that an unhappy customer tell 8-11 other people or more about their experience while happy customer tells only 3-4 (if they bother to tell anyone). All the electronic media that is now part of all our lives has simply amplified the voices of those unhappy customers while all the attention paid to social media has given them greater visibility.

Even as corporations tune in and respond to what is being written online, for every prominent blogger reaching a thousand followers, there are likely 100 regular customers reaching out through text messages, emails, phone calls, and even face-to-face conversations to share their experiences with 8-10 friends, co-workers, relatives, and neighbors. When you do the math, the impact is the same.

Attention is needed is needed both online and offline if corporations are going to succeed in shifting the balance between the negative communications that poisons the well for new customers, and the positive word of mouth that builds awareness, consideration, trial, purchase and retention.
12:30 pm edt          Comments

2010.02.01 | 2010.01.01 | 2009.11.01 | 2009.10.01 | 2009.09.01 | 2009.08.01 | 2009.07.01 | 2009.06.01 | 2009.05.01 | 2009.03.01 | 2009.02.01 | 2009.01.01

Link to web log's RSS file

 

Customer Experience Partners
Measurement, Management, Optimization

Powered by Register.com